One Sky Update: 2018 Ballot, Peninsula Chapter and more tasty info

In this chock-full email:

Your 2018 Ballot
New and different! Contributions for this Funding Cycle
New! Peninsula One Sky Chapter
Attendance NOT Required
Welcome new member Dahliah Khoury

Your 2018 Ballot
You should have just received the 2018 ballot via Survey Monkey. Votes are due June 15. If you did not, please let us know ASAP so that we may get it to you.

New and Different! Contributions for the 2018 Funding Cycle

  • Finally, online contributions! How much of a pain in the a** is it to write a paper check these days? A really big pain, indeed. So starting right now, you can make your contributions to this year’s organizations via PayPal, and still get your tax-deduction! More details on the “How to Donate” section of our website.
  • You no longer need to wonder “Have I already contributed for this funding cycle?” After you cast your votes, we will send you an “invoice” so you will know the total amount due.

Peninsula One Sky Chapter!
I am giddy to announce that we are expanding. Starting this Fall, One Sky member Jen Sweeney will be chairing our new Peninsula chapter. So, if you know wonderful folks who live south, they can now join without the schlep to the city. Important note: One Sky members of either the city or the peninsula chapters can come to events at both locations. More about the new Peninsula chapter on the website.

Attendance NOT required
I often start post-event emails with “so nice to see so many of you” but let me emphasize that attendance at One Sky events is not at all required! Whether you come to every event or nary a one, what we all have in common is that a commitment to the mission of women’s and girls’ empowerment and a desire to feel secure knowing that our money is going to well researched, solid, effective organizations in support of that mission. So, for those who choose to participate remotely, we aim to support your commitment by providing:

Minutes of all educational events
Short exec summaries of all finalist organizations as well as more detailed information for those who like to dig in.And now, as noted in my previous missive to you all, videos of the events, so you can enjoy them from you couch, in your PJs, or while pretending to do work at the office. This first attempt from our annual meeting is, shall we say, amateur, but I’m sue we will get better as we go on.

Welcome new member, Dahliah Khoury
Daliah Khoury is the Deputy Director of Development with the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department where she secures private grant funds to support park improvement projects and programs that allow San Franciscans of all ages and socioeconomic levels to maintain healthy active lifestyles. Daliah was moved to join One Sky because of her interest in issues that affect women, children and families and social justice.”

Because one can never say Thank You enough
I’d like to thank Noelle Salmi for hosting this year’s annual meeting, Lisa Acree for her masterful stewardship of the Grant Screening Committee, Nina Thompson our webmistress, All members of the rockin’ grant screening committee, Julie Caskey, Shannon Tyne, Lynda Sullivan, Jen Sweeney, Patricia Martell and Ann Roberts, Jenny Lee and Amy Paulsen, Jen Sweeney for raising her hand and saying “I want to start a chapter on the Peninsula!”, and most importantly ALL of YOU, for your continued commitment to holding up more than half the sky.

If you have read this far…I’m in awe.

Warmly and with passion for our cause,
Maryam Mohit
President, One Sky Giving Circle

New! Peninsula One Sky Chapter

How cool is this? One Sky member Jennifer Sweeney will be launching a One Sky Chapter for the peninsula starting this Fall. I’m giddy in anticipation of the increased impact we can have towards our mission. Jen has been an enthusiastic One Sky members since 2016. She loves the One Sky mission and approach, but getting to events in the city from her home in Atherton was, shall we say, a slog. So when she approached us about the idea of a southern chapter, how could we decline? How will this new chapter work and what will change?

  • When a new member joins she (or he) will indicate a primary chapter.
  • We will aim to do parallel, back to back events for both the SF/North bay and for the Peninsula. To support this additional time form our speakers, we will start giving small honorariums to some speakers.
  • Members can attend any events so, for example,in you live in the south bay and happen to be in the city on the day of an event, you can come to that event, and vice versa
  • The two chapters will share a funding focus, grant screening committee and ballot. Grants will come from the One Sky Giving Circle.

More about One Sky Peninsula Chapter Chair Jennifer Sweeney: Jennifer Sweeney, an attorney, has served as General Counsel for several start-up companies, practiced corporate law for a large law firm, and worked in private equity and investment banking. She serves on the board of the Meritus College Fund and served as Board Chair for Iqra Fund, a non-profit providing educational opportunities to girls in remote areas of Pakistan. Jennifer also serves on the Advisory Committee for Notre Dame’s Alliance for Catholic Education, providing trained teachers, administrators and resources to Catholic schools in underserved communities around the country.  Jennifer holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School and Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Notre Dame.

Two Great Events with One Sky Grantees & Notes from our last event

Hello One Skyers,

I wanted to let you know about two upcoming events
Thursday, April 26th the Women’s Community Clinic is holding their annual gala “Hysteria” at the JCC honoring Carlina Hansen (the fantastic ED who was running it when we made our grant) and featuring comedian Helen Hong. I know One Sky members Patricia Martell and Nancy Cole will be there, and I will be as well because, really, who doesn’t need a few laughs thee days?
Get tickets online ($106 each)

Tuesday, May 1 The Center for Reproductive Rights is holding their annual gala featuring Nancy Northrup in conversation with author and human rights activity Isabelle Allende (I’ve seen her speak before and she’s fabulous).
Get tickets online ($175 each)

And please remember to Save the Date on May 23rd for our own One Sky annual meeting!
And…attached are the notes and presentation from our most recent event with Caroline Hubbard, Senior Advisor on Gender, Women & Diversity at the National Democratic Institute. Thank you to Mark Selcow for taking notes and to Lisa Acree and Mark Selcow for hosting!!
Maryam Mohit

RSVP for upcoming events plus fabulous notes from our most recent two…

Greetings One Skyers,

A lot of good stuff coming up….Two events upcoming, please rsvp below. The grant screening committee is gearing up for our research this spring. Fiona Smythe and Mai Mai Wythes are working on setting up forums with the SF Mayoral candidates (more on that to come). I hope everyone is having an intellectually engaged, politically “woke”  start to spring … and how about that Frances McDormand “all stand” at the Oscars last night?

Our next Event! 
This one on the international landscape for women’s empowerment through civic engagement.
March 20th, 6PM
Home of Lisa Acree
Please RSVP via the Evite: http://evite.me/qRRmcZwc5G
Save the Date for our Annual Meeting
Wednesday, May 23rd
Home of Noelle Salmi
Notes from our two Domestic Events
Definitely read these! It’s an invaluable resource on how to think about supporting the issues you care about via philanthropic and political action.  Both are attached as .PDFs.
* Andrea Steele – “We have been hovering at the state legislative level at 25%. What is it going to take to get to 30%. Academics say 30% is the critical mass you need for a tipping point.”
* Al Acker-Lyons — “When in doubt, go local. Smaller budgets; your dollar goes further.”
Thank you to  Stephanie Shmunes and Noelle Salmi for hosting, and to Noelle for her mad typing skills!
Maryam Mohit
One Sky Giving Circle

And the One Sky winner is…

Empowerment of Women & Girls: Legal, Equal & Constitutional Rights.

Thank you to all who voted in our run-off. We now have our 2018 funding focus and will start lining up our learning and engagement events!
Next up
1. Make sure you have made your 2017 contribution and sent it to Jen Ozanne.
2. If you would like to join the grant screening committee please let Lisa Acree know.
3. Attached please find Noelle Salmi’s impeccable notes from our last two very interesting events with Rise Up (formerly Let Girls Lead) and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
FYI: In case you missed it, there was a very interesting article in today’s NYT about Thorn, an organization using technology to combat sex trafficking of minors. As a tech person, it’s nice to see technology being used for good!
Wishing everyone a happy holiday season (I can say that now that Thanksgiving has come and gone, right?)
Maryam Mohit, President

One Sky Winners and see you Wednesday!

Would love to see more of you on Wednesday
Some of our best events have been those when we get to hear from prior grantees about their triumphs and challenges doing the real work out in the field. Please RSVP to hear from our 2015 grantee Let Girls Lead about the work they are doing around the world to empower women and girls. This is event is also appropriate for our teen children, and you are welcome to bring prospective members.
RSVP: http://evite.me/sSmE8gGyvf

2017 Winners
The recent mass murders in Las Vegas and Sutherland Texas, both carried out by domestic abusers highlight the truth in the premise of our giving circle, that sexism, misogyny and the oppression of women has dire consequences not only for women but for all of society. The research is painfully clear. America’s mass shooting problem is, in part a domestic violence problem. It is sadly urgent that we are funding in this area in the aftermath of these two most recent tragedies.

Now, with pleasure and dollop of astonishment I announce the winners of the 2017 One Sky grants.
Our Domestic winner is….Tahiri Justice Center.
For international….it’s our first ever tie!!
So, what to do? Half of our collective dues will go to Tahiri Justice Center. The other half will be split between Futures without Violence and Samoa Victim Support Group. We will also be able to give a grant to Napa Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services, to help our neighbors in the North Bay. With our additional donor-directed funds included, the final tallies are as follow:

  • Tahiri $18,875
  • Woman Inc $2,675
  • Samoa $8,725
  • Futures$10,375
  • Napa $7,700

2018 Funding Focus
Either there are too many important topics and great organizations out there, or we are a somewhat indecisive group. Not only had we a tie in our 2017grants, but we also have a bit of a tie for our next funding focus. The top three foci are within .05 points of each other. In good conscience I think this demands a runoff. So please stay tuned for another, much shorter, ballot to vote for next year’s funding focus.

  • Empowerment of Women & Girls by legal and constitutional means
  • Women’s health: maternal mortality & family planning
  • Girls Education

Maryam Mohit
President, One Sky Giving Circle

One Sky Annual Meeting October 17, 2017

SAMOA VICTIM SUPPORT GROUP INC.
FUTURES VWITHOUT VIOLENCE
W.O.M.A.N. Inc. (WINC) 
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER

Samoa Victim Support Group

Intro by Grant Screening Committee member Ann Roberts:

Why I love this organization. SVSG is the only organization in Samoa that helps victims of domestic violence. They government does do this; the only organization is this one.

They are extremely effective. They have the trust of the community and international donors.

Their focus is to:
– Educate
– Empower
– Advocate for new laws
– Engage with the community

It’s hard for women especially when the government doesn’t acknowledge that it happens.
They are really good at taking best practices from around the world

Presentation by SVSG President Lina Chang:
See also her presentation at http://www.oneskygivingcircle.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/One-Sky-Presentation-1.pdf (login: osgc)

Greetings and thanks on behalf of our children survivors of violence
The women survivors of violence and the rehabilitated perpetrators of violence
Talofa! That means hello in Samoan

Our Motto:
We support
We help
We care
We are your family

A little bit about our history:

We were founded by a young female lawyer, 3 attorneys and 3 female ex-police officers who saw a gap in support for victims of sexual violence

Originally everyone worked on a volunteer basis with no salary

From 2006 to 2012 we moved from shelter to shelter without permanent accommodation

Our first office was under a shady coconut tree, then in an old building, then another one, then in 2013 we moved to the office we have now.

We now have 10 paid staff in 3 locations: 2 on Upolu and 1 on Savaii

Over 500 people are our eyes and ears. They are village leaders carrying on the work and keeping volunteer spirit alive

Our approaches:

– Advocacy: we provide guidance to the government of Samoa for legislation
– Prevention & Support
– Protection & Healing

Mothers come to us lost and suicidal

They are cast out from their families or unable to return to their villages due to danger

Our achievements to date:

Now domestic violence is criminalized through the 2013 Family Safety Act (FSA)

2013 FSA finally criminalized domestic violence

The punishment for raping a 13 year old is now life imprisonment; and we extended the definition of rape

The Family & Youth Court was created specifically for family violence

SFSG has paved the way forward for peaceful families in Samoa

The magnitude of our work is measured by the lives that we have saved

Samoa’s population is 180,000 people.

We have provided:

8532 case work assistance
215 rape case victims assisted
1212 domestic violence
213 child abuse
50 attempted suicide
897 children sheltered
105 abused mothers sheltered

Lives rehabilitated

800 kids sheltered at facilities have been successfully reintegrated into society
713 offenders have completed court referral programs

Families reunited:

We have reunited over 1000 families reunited through counseling, and over 300 through mediation programs

Families reached:

Since SFSG started its 24 hour free help line, we have reached over 100,000 people

We have reached 80,000 through ending violence awareness

We have reached over 50,000 though our “No to rape” Awareness program  in churches, villages, schools and work places

Over 10,000 throught Gender Equality Awareness

Justice served:

Over 200 sexual abuse cases heard in court with a 90% success rate

Over 300 protection order applications for family violence set by the courts

The difference we have made:

– Mentality change in villages, churches and family leaders talking positively
– Community on alert and seeking the help line for any type of support
– Our communities are stronger
– The behavioral change towards sexual and domestic violence has people speaking out

Rape campaign of 2010 has made change away from acceptance of gender based violence

With all the life saving work, mothers and children are still dying form family violence

In the shelter you now get children pregnant from incest or rape. They are suicidal. We walk with them as they seek justice against their only family members

We have consented to medical operations of abused children

For 19 months we have been.

We have evacuated children living as animal and treated as such

Our help line has extended SFSG casework assistance at any hour of the day

Exposing our own families to danger

Supporting 10-12 year olds through childbirth

Our facilities:

Campus of Hope: only shelter for abused and neglected kids in Samoa
House of Blessings: nursery for babies from incest cases
House of Hope: for kids aged 3-12
House of Dreams: dorm for girls 13+
Ray of Hope Shelter: For pregnant rape survivors
School of Hope: continuing education

Our work:
– Casework
– Counseling
– Court support
– Shelters
– Empowerment, education, livelihood training
– Community engagement
– Holding government accountable
– Supporting those with disabilities
– SVSG Juniors – we train youth for succession plan

Challenges:
– Funding
– Staff shortage
– Lack of resources
– We have no women’s shelter at the moment, so we shelter the domestic violence survivors in our homes

We believe that the strength of the family binds us and the strength of God holds us.

Q&A:

Q: Do you have verification of your work and results?
A: Yes. UN women Trust Fund. They worked with us 2011-2013. UN Women Fund for Gender Equality.

Q: What is your largest source of funding?
A: For caring of victims, it is donations. For work that we do, we have some donors who believe in us. Mainly we depend on project funding. The funding is from the donor agencies. The government of Samoa gave us a 2010 funding to carry on the rape campaign. All the premises were built by individual donors that you can contact.

Thank you for listening and please vote for us!

Futures without Violence

Intro by Grant Screening Committee head Lisa Acree:

We have Rachel Smith Fals and Kiersten Stewart from Futures without Violence.

I have so many things to say about them and why they are on our slate. I’ll say one thing that really stands for us is that you have this incredibly powerful model where at the highest levels of government here and all are the over the world they’re having an impact through this very powerful advocacy

Then at the mid level through the community perspective, in our research you come upon whole communities that are impacted by using their materials and their training and their approaches .

And also the actual individuals and caregivers who have gone through the training; people who are police officers or nurses or coaches.

You have this amazing span of impact and altogether, for me, it’s very hopeful to show what can actually be done to address this issue.

Rachel Smith Fals:

Kiersten runs our DC office. She is our Director of Policy. I’ve been at Futures 15 years and Kiersten 17. We have a long, deep history.

You are a very unique group in terms of how you have researched this issue, the process you have gone through, it’s really impressive.

I’ve spent a lot of time with foundation and giving circles and I thank you for the thoughtful process you have done.

It’s also an honor to see groups like SVSG. They are why we do what we do and the way that we do it

Background:

Our mission: Women must be safe before they can learn, earn and thrive.

Safety is so core to everyone that we do as an organization.

Basic human right to live a life free of violence

Violence is learned and can be unlearned

We believe that we have the power and, now, the evidence to create futures without violence.

Esta Soler started the organization in San Francisco. We have now grown to be national and international.

Our HQ is in the Presidio. Come and visit us. We are creating an immersive learning center to become a destination for the world and place that is dedicated to creating new solutions and really engaging people in everyday acts that we can all participate in.

1984 – Esta was part of a core group that passed some of the first legislation in California and nationally.

She was giving presentation on this to the state legislature, and one of the male legislator said that would be taking the fun out of marriage. That was 1984 in a progressive state.

Only a decade later did we pass the first federal law to make domestic violence a crime.

It’s an important reminder that it hasn’t been that long.

But we have made incredible progress.

Since that time we have helped reduce domestic violence and violent crimes against adult women by over 64% in this country alone.

We have a lot more work to do on that here and internationally, particularly with younger women, which is why we are here

In terms of our impact, tonight we are focusing on international.

Kiersten leads our international portfolio on Capitol Hill, so I’ll just give a brief overview:

In early 90s (93) original Violence Against Women Act

We were approaching, and still approach, this work by sector.

We started in the health sector because we know that most women may not call the police but they would go to the hospital; so we started going into the hospital to train and work with physicians to identify and work with victims

We also started working with law enforcement

We started to build a body of evidence that was getting some traction internationally

In the early 1990s and mid-90s, we started going internationally and giving in-country training.

We moved into Russia to give them training in health care setting

Started also started doing work directly in Mexico

We helped pass some of the first laws in India (which sadly only happened recently, but the work started in mid90s)

The work wasn’t necessarily scalable, so in the late 2000s to mid 2000s we started looking domestically at what we could do to influence the global agenda and global policy and global investment.

 

Esta went to Ford Foundation and said we need to make this a priority. The Ford Foundation funded her to go to Beijing and she worked with Hillary Clinton there, where Hillary made the now famous words that “Womens rights are human rights”

So we came back to the US and started working with the US government to influence the policies that were being shaped.

You heard SVSG talked about the UN Trust Fund for Women

In the early 2000s, they were about to go bankrupt until Kiersten came in and said no

these are organizations that can’t do the work without that funding

We worked with policy makers, who came together for this fund and now it’s at $20M

The other key point in 2000s in terms of our international strategy

We had success with Violence Against Women Act – So we worked on International Violence Against Women Act, to strengthen US investments in programs and policies through a gender lens.

Under Obama we were able to get it through an administrative strategy and not a legislative strategy.

Now it’s extremely under threat.

We’ve been a Four Star Rated Organization on Charity Navigator for 11 Years

Kiersten Stewart

We do what we do, so groups like SVSG can do what they do

We went from doing our own work with organizations to rethinking how we can support them. We support them through US advocacy

1 in 840 women had polio at the height of the epidemic

1 in 25 women had HIV/AIDS at the height of the epidemic

1 in 8 have breast cancer in US

1 in 3 women experience domestic violence in the US and internationally

Globally, that domestic violence number is up to 70% in some countries

  • These are the reported numbers. We now it’s grossly underreported. These numbers are the minimum.

Universal value: No woman wants to be beaten, raped or killed. That in and of itself is the reason we should be focused on violence against women.

We also know that violence Against Women is that undercurrent that often inhibits our success in international development aid around girls’ education and economic empowerment.

If girls are being abused, if they are being forced into early marriage, they are unable in many cases to take advantage of many of the programs that we offer.

So I never want to say that we care about violence, because we care about all of these other things. They both matter.

I want to reiterate our appreciation for your considering the issue of violence. It’s something that’s really important. Whatever you choose I hope you maintain your focus on this.

We are asking for support for:
– Rapid Response Fund
– To invest in our International Advocacy.

We are a strong and healthy organization based here in SF. Our international advocacy is not in the same place and that’s why we’re asking for help

What we want, in the administration, a lot of the progress we’ve made in the last 15 years is under direct threat

There was a document released today that showed that the UN Trust Fund, which we spent a lot of effort to try to fund, UN Women Fund, which you heard highlighted a primary funding source for SVSG – and that true for hundreds of organizations around the world. The budget draft we’ve seen showed a 29% cut in international funding.

We are the organization that’s leading the work to maintain the international funding.

The International Violence Against Women Act is about to be reintroduced next week. Many members of Congress haven’t seen it yet; we don’t even have a bill number yet.

But what we do in Washington is we try to solve problems.

We maintain leadership in State Department and US Aid to make sure that the international work around gender based violence and supporting women on the ground internationally continues.

We have offices at USAID and State Department

We are also in a migration crisis

We’re seeing enormous rates of conflict

Most refugees are women and children

They are at risk for trafficking and violence in camps

We all want to be there for the victims, but the best gift is never to be a victim in the first place. At Futures without Violence that’s where we spend your time

We were able to get the US to increase budget to $160M annually against gender-based violence

Multiple agencies that have to report their success are more likely to do good programming

Kiersten leads our policy work in DC. There are no other groups in DC that leads this agenda and the advocacy in DC

We only have $65K allocated to this work this year

Also the education of the staff people

People coming into these position and they have no awareness and no knowledge of the impact of these programs

Q&A

Q: Would more people be funded on Capitol Hill? Is it more research? Could you break down what they funding is going towards
A: It is staff personal. We have a staff person we won’t have if we don’t raise the funding. She’s amazingly talented and we’d like to keep that work going.

In addition, we try to do educational briefings on Capitol Hill. Nov 25 is International Day to End Violence Against Women. If possible, if can grow the portfolio, we really try to bring women’s organizations to the US and we like to bring them, whenever possible, to speak for themselves.

There’s an incredible movement; there’s a global movement to end violence against women. We’d love you all to consider coming.

When we do these briefings and events they are incredibly powerful. These women have never experienced anything like this, and their stories can have a lasting impact.

Q: Do you have to get a congressman to push it for you?
A: Joe Biden was our first champion. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) is the original sponsor; she’s a senator. Sen from John Isakson (R-GA) and Susan Collins (R-ME) are the Republican co-sponsors working on this.

We recognize politics are tough right now. We’re not going to get anything done if we do not have Republican leaders so we spend a lot of time cultivating them and getting them educated about these issues.

And the truth is, violence against women is one place where we can make bipartisan progress.

The Senate Bill is of the International Violence Against Women Act is ready to go. The

House has a companion bill. Our goal is to introduce the same bill in both house; we are negotiating with them now.

We are hoping the house bill is identical

We’re hoping the next week it will get voted on. To pass the bill and continue to fund it is a challenge in this administration, but we always think we can make progress.

Esta inspires us. She is the eternal optimist

Yes, there are things that are challenging, but I don’t want to spend time on what’s challenging. I want to spent time on how you’re going to get it done.

W.O.M.A.N. Inc.

Intro by Grant Screening Committee member Shannon Tyne:

We are happy to have Jill Zawisza here with us tonight. She’s the executive director. She’s been working in the field for 20 years and with W.O.M.A.N. Inc. for the last ten.

W.O.M.A.N. Inc. has been a critical resource in the Bay Area to support survivors and families of domestic abuse. Through a number of comprehensive services and programs they are able to provide life changing experiences for survivors.

Some of the most powerful ways to describe what W.O.M.A.N. Inc. does is through words of someone they’ve helped: “I’ll forever be grateful that they were there for me in the lowest moment of my life. I had been in an abusive relationship and my former partner was stalking me. I was isolated, alone, afraid. I went to W.O.M.A.N. Inc. to get a restraining order. They listened. I felt validated and they made me realize just how abusive my relationship had been. The prepared the paperwork and went to court with me. It’s been 15 years and I’ve since recovered from my abusive childhood and that relationship, but I still look back at my day at W.O.M.A.N. Inc. as my first day of healing.”

Jill Zawisza, Executive Director:

There are six of us.

It is domestic violence awareness month and we are hustling all over the place right now. We are very passionate about what we do and we are pretty darn good at it.

We are greatful to be here. We have a packet with our annual report, services we provide, etc. We really would hope to build a partnership with you all.

After Trump’s election we got a lot of calls. It was very triggering for a lot of people who had survived domestic violence, sexual harassment, sexual assault to know that this person was elected. Our question was, what are we good to do about it. Well, we thought let’s be real clear about how we are and what we believe in. So we came up with these statements:

We are:
pro immigrant
pro love
pro Muslim
pro people of color
pro queer
pro reproductive justice
pro survivor
pro trans folks

We believe in collective liberation and that everyone deserves to be safe in their bodies, homes, streets.

Whenever anyone wants to work with us, we cross check it with our strategic goals:

  • Foster innovation and collaboration through scalable, high-performing partnerships
  • Widen the scope of impact
  • Continuously improve quality of care
  • Grow funding sustainably
  • Develop and capitalize on strength of our reputation
  • Maintain vibrant organizational culture

We offer a low cost, high yield model. We are very solid in the stewardship of our resources.

We have 9.44 full time employees. What that means is there are six of us in the office doing full time work and the rest of us plug in as needed.

We have a large network of volunteers. 60 people volunteer every month. If they are really good we pluck them out and cultivate them and pay them.

82% if all of our funding goes down to program support.

When we’re making decisions, I mentioned that we have strategic goals in mind. We also have a lengthy document, which we call our cultural praxis document with our values. It’s on our website, but here are a few of our values:

Our values:
– Anti-oppression and intersectional feminism
– We work towards social, racial and economic justice.
– We are mindful that people who come to us are surviving domestic violence but that does not define who they are. We are human beings and we have a plethora of identities in the world. Our framework of anti oppression is where do those identities intersect and how are they making this experience harder for the survivor and how are they making it easier? What resources do those identities bring to the table? To us that’s very important to how we see feminism: it’s intersectional. Our feminism has to be wide, and we want to work towards the benefit of all women.
– Meeting survivors where they are. It’s important to understand that a lot of the go-to options that we might think of – the most common is calling the police – are not an option for many people. It can be a huge threat, it can actually escalate violence. There are communities of color who are murdered by some police departments. We’ve got people who are just afraid. They don’t want to get anyone into trouble. They want the violence to end. They don’t want anyone to go to jail.

If they do want the police to arrest someone, we will file a report with them at the police department.

Whatever it is they’re bringing with them, we honor and respond to. We don’t have a go-to guide of how to support someone. We have a foundation of listening, honoring, respecting – then we figure out what it is they need and what we may be able to do in that spectrum of service.
– Very positive workplace environment

All of the staff have stayed for years. It’s an awesome place to work. We are big on self care. The work we do can be rough. We hear disgusting things that human beings do to someone; it’s a lot to listen to and contain. We want to support your feelings, we know that you may feel triggered. A lot of us doing the work are also survivors of domestic violence. We honor who people are, we give a lot of time off when needed, we do staff care days. We are intentional about creating a nice place to work that people don’t want to leave.

Outcomes:

Based on evaluation reports, which is in packet and online.

People tell us they feel better about themselves when they are engaged with our counselors. They don’t feel as isolated.

They have more extensive their support networks. It’s really hard to create support networks when you’re constantly in crisis. When you are talking with someone about it, getting some help and making some forward momentum, you can reach out for help and find friends again.

We’ve had people start businesses and come in and offer their services.

People talk about improved physical and mental.

We feel we build stronger communities, because we get out there, we try and share our knowledge and learn from folks who come into the organization.

Activities:

We have a 24-hour support line. It’s a monster to run; there are six of us. It’s a lot.

We get about 9000 to 10,000 calls a year.

We mostly talk to people who are survivors, but we also connect to organizations who perhaps don’t do domestic violence work themselves but they have someone who is experiencing it and we walk them through it.

We have an online database that connects folks with shelter information; whether shelters are doing intake interviews.

That is a statewide database. We have 70 members on it.

A program I really want to talk about gets back to survivors doing the work:

Echando Pa’lante – The program run by women who are monolingual Spanish speakers who’ve come through the agency’s services and went through the training to become counselors and they counsel other women in the community. It’s the idea of healing through helping.

They have made amazing changes in their lives.

To wrap up, in the power point I’ve put in some survivors’ stories.

Q&A

Q: How would you use the funding?
A: The Echando Pa-lante program is really the future of what we think we want to do. Stabilizing that pipeline of women who have come through the services who want to heal through helping. About 65% of the volunteers who came last year are themselves survivors, and we want to widen that percentage. It takes a lot of work to engage participants, to do the assessment to see if they are in the space to do it yet. So it would be building on the project, but we really believe in the approach and how it works.

Q: So would the funding help you develop this group or other groups like Echando Pa’lante?
A: Yes, we envision engaging these women to do the training themselves. We just translated our training materials into Spanish. And we do pay them. That’s where we think the field needs to go.

Q: Just to clarify, you would be paying more trainers so they could expand the program? That’s exactly where the money would go?
A: The money would go to paying the trainers, but also from the leadership team’s perspective, there’s probably a couple of people I’d want to create a project plan, do the evaluation, assess what needs to be changed, tweak the program a little bit, and then implement it. Having resources to let them have at it, along with paying the trainers.

Q: Where are the services? Are they local?
A: We are in SF. We’re in SOMA. Our hotline, gets calls from all over the state. And out of state calls.

Q: How do people hear about you?
A: Primarily through our partner organizations. We have 69 very close partners we work with who refer to us. We get also referrals when we go out tabling and when we do presentations, we’ll get people calling. Our come in through a walk-in session.

Q: How is the hotline staffed?A: Primarily it’s run through volunteers, but there are more high-volume shifts that we the paid staff will plug into. We all do direct service, no matter our role. We staff the drop-in counseling. That can be more intense. We put people who are more seasoned into the drop-in counseling. That is mostly us.

Q: Do you have a network of people you refer people to, like lawyers and doctors?
A: We have a huge network. We do refer out; we have a few good connections with local organizations that represent clients. We have a grant with a local restraining order clinic and sexual assault center in city. We have lots of good connections that we refer out to when we need to.

Tahirih Justice Center

Intro by Grant Screening Committee member Lynda Sullivan:

It was my privilege to research the Tahirih Justice Center. It’s an organization that works with immigrant women and girls who have been victims of gender based violence.

They are headquartered in DC and recently opened an office in BA and the grant proposal is to support the work here locally.

The things that impressed the screening committee about Tahirih are:

  1. They are the organization that works exclusively with immigrant women and girls and gender based violence and in the current political climate, it’s hard to imagine a group any more vulnerable that this group.
  2. They have an incredible operating model. The primary direct service they offer is free legal advice. They help women get assylum and visas in the US. They have a network of of pro bono attorneys who work with them to take on these cases.

Across their entire organization last year, there were $12M of donated legal services. So every $1 from us or anyone else that gets invested in Tahiri ends up supporting $4 worth of work, which is an incredibly attractie return on investment.

  1. We like the combination of direct services and national advocacy. There’s an opportunity to both to make a difference in in women’s lives here in our community and to support to work the organizations does in trying to effect systemic change in advocating for better politices and laws in everything from immigration policy and detention policy to, believe it or not, trying to stop child marriages here in the US.
  2. The organization has been around a long time and has an incredible track record of success, and the Bay Area team is very impressive. They have ramped up very quickly. We all felt that an investment here would be really well stewarded and would be able to make a difference.

Morgan Weibel (Executive Director) and Theresa Samuel-Boko (Development Director)

Morgan Weibel:

You prounounce Tahirih like Hooray with Ta in front: Ta-hooray.

VIDEO:
Layli Miller-Muro started the organization after being involved in a case where a girl was fleeing Togo, where she was feeling a forced marriage and female genital mutilation. At that time, in 1995, our laws did not provide refugee status to girls and women who were fleeing forms of persecution that were being inflicted simply because they were women.

I argue her case before the immigration judge. It was appealed all the way to the highest immigration court in the US, where it received a good deal of media attention and ishe won. And that case set a precedent, opening the doors to legislation in what we now call

“Gender based asylum.”

Narrator: Some of our clients have experienced terrible violence. Female genital mutilation, domestic violence… They experience these types of violence more than women do simply because of their gender. 

Then showed a woman from Honduras. Translation: my country of origin in Honduras. My town is small, but we are not untied. Everyone deals with their own problems. I was at parties and weddings, he tried to take me. Then he kidnapped me. I didn’t want to be with him. I was only 15; he ripped my shirt and raped me. I felt so dirty, I didn’t want to have anything to do with anyone. 

The man came one night and broke my door and raped me again. I got pregnant.

Narrator: Being Tramautized makes it hard to share and tell the details of your story. We work very hard developing a relationship with each of the women who approaches us seeking help so she feels she can open up to us.  

Aracely told things us things she couldn’t tell anybody else. Sometimes she could only do it in the quietest voice because she was so ashamed of the things that had happened to her. That was probably the hardest thing because she didn’t ask for them.

Aracely was raising her son and she met a nice guy and she became pregnant and the horrible rapist came back. The guy returned and killed her kids.

Aracely story was brutal.  

Narration: By the time our client get to us, they are already heroes. They’ve traveled across deserts and over oceans, they’ve had to navigate a system where they don’t understand the law, they language. And many of them have had to do that with infants in tow, with young children who are dependent on them and with absolutely no resources, while the contend with ostracism and exclusion from their families. It’s a real privilege to be able to support them in their journeys.

The complexity and inaccessibilty of the system means that without a lawyer, you have only a 16% change of success. With any lawyer, you have 47% chance of success. And with the Tahiri Justice Center’s legal representation, you have a 99% chance of success.

Unfortunately, we can only help 1 in 10 girls when they call for help. There is so much more than we could do. Our model is very efficient. We turn every dollar donated into

4 of impact. We’re now in multiple cities throughout the US and a national leader in public policy advocacy on behalf of women and girls.

We have a long way to go before women and girls are truly protected from violence. We need financial resources we need donors to protect women and girls from violence and help transform society.

Morgan Weibel:

First of all, my apologies. I generally give a trigger warning before showing that video. The reason we felt it important to show a video like that is because Aracely’s story is increasingly the norm. It’s no longer an outlier. It helps give you a sense of the incredible heroes we are working with as our clients.

There was so much more that Aracely needed than just legal representation. I’m an immigration lawyer by training. I like to think that I make an impact in the world, but my work has made me see that clients need so much more than legal assistance in order to attain justice, to rebuild their lives, and to become safe and successful and thrive.

Who’s most important in our office?
Probably our social services department and our wrap-around services that they provide. For example, getting her therapy services in culturally specific and meaningful ways. Making sure that she was prepared when that daughter was going to be reunited with her years later. Some of our clients need to get divorces, they need to get full legal custody of their children, and to be able to provide that all under one roof and in house is incredible, because we’re able to work as a team in the organization.

Many of our clients are survivors who need medical services – we have a pro bono medical network.

Aracley was 15 the first time she was married. A lot of times the solution in these communities is to force these people into marriages. That’s where our forced marriage initiative comes into plays and it helps not only women who are facing forced marriages in the US but throughout the world.

We work from a holistic services model. We are facing historic numbers of people coming across the southern border.

We are unique in that we both provide direct services and national public policy advocacy. We are fighting so many battles, so many fronts, so many times. And to be able to have an impact you need both boots on the ground and you also need individuals that are able to move mountains for them.

I want to share a story of a client who we were able to help here in the SF office. Our first victory in this office. Tahirih has existed for 20 years but we opened our Bay Area office in January 2016.

A client several months ago said that her deportation and removal officer said that she needed to bring him a passport or he wouldn’t remove her ankle bracelet electronic monitoring device.

This client was applying for asylum, and as an immigration attorney I had to tell her it could work against her in front of the judge, so she couldn’t then apply for a passport.

What we settled on is I wrote a letter to her deportation officer; I got a call from a very upset and irate deportation and removal officer. He berated me and said how dare you do this? I told him it could negatively impact my clients’ case. After the call, I called my colleagues in the DC office. They called this deportation officers boss’ boss’ boss and explained what was happening here. They agreed with us because the law is clear because it could negatively affect her case.

That higher up in DC called the officer here in SF and my cleint’s ankle bracelet was taken off the next day.

That’s the power and impact when you have both direct services and a policy and advocacy department fighting within the government.

Another thing that is critical is that we are non-partisan. We believe that women’s rights are not a partisan issue. They are human rights and everyone can agree on that. That has also allowed us some access in this administration in whatever limited way we can push things along for our clients.

I will end on a slide. We are a staff of six in Bay Area. As Lynda mentioned earlier, our goal for this first year was to help 50 full service clients and impact 120 client throughout the year.

I’m happy to report we now have 76 full service clients.

We were hoping to grow our pro bono network to 150 attorneys. We do use them; they are a critical force in us being able to meet the needs of more women and girls. We now have 127 from 25 of the top bay area’s top law firms and corporations. They’re the ones that ones that give us the 1 to 4 impact.

We have reached 912 professionals through 22 outreach and training events.

And we’re note done yet. We still have a couple more months in the year.

Q&A:

Q: How do clients find you? You said you can only help 1 in 10 who come to you; how do you determine which to take?
A: We are lucky in this office and we are in building mode and we haven’t had to turn away clients yet. We set a core criteria in each office based on what we think we can accomplish and other what gaps people aren’t filling. We specifically focus on gender based violence. There are many organizations that do immigrant rights, but there is a very small niche in the area of the law that deals with gender based cases.

It’s complex and at the cutting edge of the law. We are trying to push the boundaries of the legal definitions right now. We feel a responsibility to take those cases first because we know that others may not take those. That is always at the top of our criteria. And then it’s what we can handle and what we can get in a given time period. If someone comes to 3 days before a hearind and we can’t possibly file something and represent and that’s not going to be at the top of our list. Likewise, if someone has something far out and we know no one else ca help them, then we will sit down with them.

Clients are coming through direct referrals from other like minded organizations in the area. We did a lot of outreach with other nonprofits when we came to BA. But I’ve had clients get referrals from other clients. One woman said I met a lady at a detention center in Texas who said I needed to find the pajarito (little bird) lady. The client was illiterate and the bird is in our logo.

Q: How do clients find you? Do you have any attorneys that volunteer 1-2 days per week and how can you incentivize them?
A: Yes, we talked about our pro bono attorney network. Those attorneys are assigned along a Tahirih attorney in the process to coach them and mentor them through it. The other thing we do is we offer a volunteer attorney position. Those attorneys who’ve worked with us often have a good experience so when they decide to career shift or try something new, they’ll come and work with us. We ask for minimum of 6 months. They are here a minimum of 3 days a week.

We out a lot fo thought into. We send out a bro bono newsletter to keep them engaged in changes in the law, and what’s happening in office, and trainings and in each of those we do a pro bono spotlight. We try to do annual events that appreciate them and our gala events we have an award for attorney of the year.

Clients find us by Googling us, looking for domestic violence and protection from female genital mutilation and that sort of thing. They find out about us for mother clients. They may be staying at a shelter and seeking an immigration attorney and they shelter gives them our name.

Q: Is it mostly asylum? As well as domestic violence reports?
A: Assylum, diverse visas for different types of violence.

Special immigrant juvenile status also. All of our work is in the federal courts here in the US. We don’t do any work abroad, aside from our forced marriage initiative, which touches on abroad.

Maryam: Thank you to our four organizations. Thank you to all of you for how we are going to enable to the organizations.

It’s a great time to bring friends. I hope you were not just inspired but learned a lot. It is our mission: Educate, Engage and then Fund.

Invite friends and men too! The ballots will go out on Monday. The four organizations will be on there. You will vote the pool (that is from our pool) and then you can allocate additional funds.

Unusually, this year we are going to put one more organization on the ballot. The

Napa Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse Services. They were on our short list on the Grant Screening Committee.

Lisa and I both felt that, given the fires, we all want to help. This is a way for us to help victims that are likely to become double victims. Special opportunity for us to be able to make a difference in our community.

They won’t be eligible for the pool funds, but for additional funds that we want to give.

There are a lot of ways that we can help the fire victims, primarily financially at this point.

I’m very glad that domestic violence and violence against women is a non-partisan topic. I myself am not nonpartisan. So good for you guys for doing that.

At this moment, with our Harassor in Chief in the White House and with Hurricane Harvey, and with all the #metoo’s filling our social media feeds, that’s just on the domestic front. And with Russian decriminalizing domestic violence, this is a really timely issue.

This is moment for us to speak up and speak out. It’s not a comfortable issue, but this is our chance to make a difference for our maybe our most basic right, the right to feel safe. Please keep that in mind when you cast your ballots.

Thanks.

One Sky ballot coming your way!

There’s a lot of important info in this email so I beseech you to read it to the end…
I know, I know, I say it every year, but wow! I’m so impressed with both the work that our “final four” are doing to prevent and combat violence against women and by the work our One Sky members do in researching and presenting these organizations.
At this moment in our country’s history, with the harasser in chief in the white house, and the #MeToos filling our social media feeds, and internationally with Russia just this year decriminalizing domestic violence..we all know in our hearts that this is a moment when we need to speak up and speak out and make sure that we protect that most basic right — the right to just feel safe.
A few not so fun facts before you vote:
  • On average, nearly 20 people per minute are physically abused by an intimate partner in the United States. During one year, this equates to more than 10 million women and men.

  • 1 in 3 women have been victims of [some form of] physical violence by an intimate partner within their lifetime

  • 1 in 7 women have been stalked by an intimate partner during their lifetime to the point in which they felt very fearful or believed that they or someone close to them would be harmed or killed

And the question is…what are you — and we as a giving circle — going to do about it?

 
For those who were not at the annual meeting
While we know that attending One Sky events is a fun and informative part of the giving circle, it is by no means required and we endeavor to fulfill our mission of educating and engaging our members by making minutes of all events available after the event. The minutes and the presentations given can be found on the One Sky website (password osgc).
For those who were are the annual meeting
If you brought a guest, please follow up with her to see if she would like to join ASAp, so she can vote in this year’s cycle and be invited to our upcoming events. Contact info@oneskygivingcircle.org
 
Thank Yous
Thank you again to Elizabeth Spokes for once again hosting our annual meeting, to Lisa Acree for fearlessly leading our grant screening committee, to Noelle Salmi for typing like a bat out of hell so that all members can learn from each event, to the grant screening committee: Lynda Sullivan, Ann Roberts, Shannon Tyne, Connie Wu and Julie Caskey, what a fun, smart and insightful group!
How the Ballot Works:
  1. You will receive your 2017 ballot via Survey Monkey just after I click “send’ on this email. If you do not get it, please check your spam filets and let me know asap.
  2. You first “vote the pool” to allocate our main grant which comes from our combined membership dues
  3. You then add your “donor directed” $ to add funds above and beyond our minimal membership dues.
  4. Special note: On your ballots you will also see one additional organization that you can contribute to through One Sky, that is NEWS,  Napa Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse Services. They were on our short list, and while they aren’t among our 4 finalists, given the tragic fires and tremendous stresses that those communities are under, violence against women is likely to surge, and we wanted to give everyone in One Sky the opportunity to support fire victims who become double victims of the devastation.
  5. Voting ends at 10PM on Novemebr 5th
How to send your contribution
  • Make checks payable to “Schwab Charitable Fund”. (NOT to One Sky!)
  • Write “One Sky #7976-3852” in the memo line
  • Mail to: Jennifer Ozanne, 4433 17th Street, San Francisco, CA 94114 (info@oneskygivingcircle.org)

An additional event (this week) and a point of interest

We are all invited to a Celebration of finalist Tahirih’s First Year of Service in the  San Francisco Bay Area

Date & Time: Thursday, October 26, 2017, 6:00–8:00 pm
Location: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Three Embarcadero Center, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111
RSVP HERE

Girls Education & Family Planning as a means to fight Climate Change

Member Mai Mai Wythes reports that at a recent Climate Reality Project meet up the speaker, Paul Hawkin, was there to promote his book Drawdown (written with Tom Steyer.) Two of the top 10 solutions in a list of 80 ways to fight climate change are…drum roll…6 Educating Girls and #7 Family Planning! Summary of Solutions by Overall Rank
Thank you all and thank you for being part of One Sky — an thank you for reading this far!
Maryam Mohit
President, One Sky Giving Circle

Announcing the 2017 One Sky Slate!

Greeting One Sky Members,

I know that many of us are focused now on the disaster unfolding to our north and the scores of people —  including friends, family or loved ones — who are directly impacted by this tragedy. As I’m announcing with great pleasure, the slate for our 2017 funding cycle, I want to simultaneously acknowledge this terrible situation. I hope that we are all thinking of and acting on ways that we can help there in the days and weeks to come.
Now, to our slate of 4 wonderful and deserving organizations. Over the course of the summer the Grant Screening Committee, lead by Lisa Acree and comprised of Ann Roberts, Lynda Sullivan, Shannon Tyne, Connie Wu, Julie Caskey and myself researched 17 highly recommended organizations. The process of narrowing it down to just four is always difficult, and this year was no exception as there are so many groups doing powerful and life-saving work in this area.
Announcing our 2017 finalists
In advance of or right after our annual meeting you can read up on the finalists here. Ballots go out right after he annual meeting.
Domestic
International
 
RSVP to our Annual Meeting
Our annual meeting is right around the corner, next Thursday, October 19th. Please RSVP (even if you can’t make it) so that our gracious hostess will know how many seats to set out. http://evite.me/RG1y126a8S
 
Our 2017 funding focus in the news
Many you you may have read the cover story in Sunday’s SF Chronicle, in which Beverly Upton who met with us last spring was quoted several times. It reminds us that violence against women is a deadly problem and that it can and must be stopped.
More upcoming events
Yours in moving forward,
Maryam Mohit
One Sky Giving Circle

Futures Without Violence, April 19, 2017

Rachael Smith Fals, Senior Vice President, Public Engagement and Corporate Relations
Sara Kriksciun, Chief Development Officer

Rachael: In dealing with ending violence against women, these are important questions:

  • Role of men?

  • Idea of law enforcement – when to leave?

  • Funding landscape – role of public and private

  • Theories of change for ending domestic violence

  • Role of advocacy, prevention and direct service?

  • “State of the art” on evidence-based best practices for programs (What’s known to be most effective)?)

  • Are there any emerging areas that show great promise but are underfunded?

  • Are there any particular things we should think about or look out for as we evaluate organizations to fund?

  • We will definitely want to know about great organizations that we should consider funding, but that can come at the end and/or in follow up 🙂

  • Focus on prevention or survivors?

We are very close with Nick Kristoff and Sheryl WuDunn and are so grateful for what they’ve done for this issue. It’s so great to have an ally, especially an ally who has a platform like his…they have done so much to give voice for so many women and girls around the world.

We are not a direct service organization. We do not treat victims and survivors in a face to face way. We advance policy, best practice, procedure.

We were started here in SF over 30 years ago. Esta Soler is the founder and president.

Sarah’s area of expertise is in the international sector. She has spent 15-20 years working in over 50 countries. I do more domestic facing initiatives and Sarah does more international.

Sara Kriksciun: I want to echo Rachael’s thanks. You could be doing anything tonight and you are here to learn about this issue.

First project was domestic violence in Poland, about a common practice in Poland at that time, which was the 7 day rule. If a woman was beaten by husband, she was told to come back in 7 days. If the bruises were still visible, then and only then could she press charges. I was working with UN on their 5 year strategy on ending violence against women.

Rachael: I’ve been with Futures Without Violence for 15 years…a group of women could create a place and space here in SF that would be dedicated to ending and preventing violence against women.

We have a video which is part of a new initiative called changing minds, because it exposes so many different aspects of violence. A core strategy of building leadership with people who are in critical roles interacting with people who can be affected by violence, such as coaches, the health care sector; effecting changes in social and cultural norms; looking at what influences us.

https://changingmindsnow.org/stories

System and policy change and cultural norms, and they way the two interact. Engaging athletics as a platform, reaching men around norms of healthy masculinity. How to talk about these issues in ways that don’t emasculate.

Leadership: coaching boys into men.

Engaging men as a strategy: When we can change the way men relate to women and create a more respectful home, —that’s a real opportunity.

The role of science: What we are learning in neuroscience about the impact of exposure to violence in the home? Plays out in mental health, PTSD, 11 million children a year. Chronic heart disease, behavioral issues, smoking, drug abuse – so much can be traced back to being a victim of Domestic violence.

Neuroscience: what happens to a young brain when exposed to violence in the home?

  • 1 out of 4 victim of domestic violence in the US (!!)

  • 1 in 5 is victim of sexual assault

  • that number increases to one-third of all women if you include international.

Individuals like the coach, the nurse can play an intervening role.

Ages of 16 to 19 is the fastest growing age for sexual assault due to cyber bullying.

Question: Is this due to availability of porn?

Rachael: We do know that most boys by age of 12 have assessed porn.

Work closely with Shafia Zaloom at Urban on documentary Audrey and Daisy…. Shafia knows that so man other boys are learning about sex from porn.

California is the only state in the country where consent education is mandatory.

Investing in prevention and education. Our Theory of Change: we really believe in policy, advocacy and changing systems.

Things like talking about it in schools, gearing up for fight of our lives. We’ve never seen such threat to progress since 1993, when we first started collecting data. Only in 1993 was domestic violence made a federal crime.

Social and cultural norm change is crucial. If we don’t change the way men and women and boys and girls relate to each other we will keep having the same conversation.

Since 1993, 64% reduction in violent crimes against women.

Believe in protections and supportive environments for survivors. Medicaid, therapeutic services. Dept of Education has Title IX to keep girls safe in school…

Sarah:

The scope of the issue: 1 in 3 women worldwide will experience sexual or domestic violence.

Data from the Wolrd Health Organization: in parts of Africa, it’s more than 46%. In parts of southeast Asia over 40%. A global public health epidemic. Imagine if you head of a disease that was impacting one-third of people.

Believe it’s the foundation of women’s empowerment. Women must first be safe.

I have a daughter who was in the foster system. If women aren’t safe, how can they learn?

Sustainable Development Goals by 2030: Gender based violence was not part of the millennium goals. Look at goals 5 and 16. Shows what countries will be tracking

WHO – not until 2013 did we as a global community begin to track rates of violence against women. That body of work is really useful. UN Women – Global database and virtual knowledge center.

Theories of change for ending domestic violence. Resources: 30-40 years ago the concept of domestic violence wasn’t really there. No language (Gloria Steinem started a couple of core components…do women and girls know their rights?)

– Do they know that this is something that doesn’t have to happen?

– Do women have access to services and protections? Example Russia: worked to put laws on books and a few months ago some laws rolled back.  Laws and holistic service, like economic support, health services, and mental health services

Context is really critical:

  • The setting: is this rape being used as weapon of war?

  • Is it intimate partner violence?

  • Or is it in a refugee camp?

The setting really drives what the Theory of Change is and what will work

The type of violence – a young girl’s sexual assault on bus in india, trafficking? It’s really important when thinking about what is most effective?

What is the age: Young girl? Adolescent girl? Or a woman?

– Awareness

– Access to services

Social norms – This involves men. Those who experience violence as a child are likely to perpetrate. Goal: when abusers get called on their behavior, the majority will speak up against it. Engaging men and bystander intervention.

A quote from a volunteer who wrote about social norms: There was a time in the US when smoking was acceptable everywhere. No one would ever ask someone to not smoke. Non-smokers simply put up with it. Those attitudes have changed dramatically in this country. Parents are banned from smoking even near a kids’ sporting event.

My goal is to see the day when it is not socially acceptable to speak down to or abuse a woman, when there is no loner any social pressure to laugh or remain silent to fit in with the guys. I want to see a radical change in social attitudes.

Early Intervention is another component in the Theory of Change is. Perpetrators of violence were likely victims themselves

Men as a part of the solution to prevent violence. In the 80s and 90s a lot of work focused exclusively on women and girls.

– But research has shown that leaving out the men who will influence the women is ineffective.

Question: I’m a nurse practitioner and I would talk to adolescents. The girls say they didn’t say no and they froze and we talked to the boys for listening for yes. I thought that would start something more in school.

Sarah: Shafia (at Urban) was a curriculum developer for affirmative consent education. California is the only state in the country that mandates that affirmative consent education be taught in schools in the K-12 environment. Part of a package that Jerry Brown signed as governor.

However, it’s county by county in terms of implementation. There’s no federal mandate and Congress just doesn’t even want to talk about sex in education. It’s a mountain, but we need to keep applying pressure.

Watch Audry and Daisy. Until parents and local elected leaders start demanding that consent education be taught in schools, it won’t be.

We have a whole other set of challenges in education. The new Department of Education won’t even commit to enforcing the protections that Obama Administration put in place. It’s possible that the whole Office of Civil Rights will be moved out of the Department of Education and into the Department of Justice, where the head cares even less about civil rights.

This is a fierce sense of urgency that we have.

Shafia’s work is life changing and when you see high schoolers talk about a conversation during sex and creating mutual consent in those situations…

Question: What happens when my daughter goes to college and leaves the SF bubble? The goal is that everyone has this understanding, but until we adopt that cultural change, how can we best prepare our daughters for that shock?

Rachael: There’s not one clear answer. The social norm talk that Sarah was addressing and what does it mean to be a real man and talking about these issues with men? A lot of our work was born out of conversations with men. We know the majority of men are not perpetrators, but then what happened to this girl in Saratoga – kids got drunk and made really bad decisions, because you need one bystander. There were 12 kids and she was raped by four of her friends, Audry’s dad said. Bystander intervention is one of the critical pieces we coach.

We live in the bubble but SF is one of the 124 communities in the country that is being investigated for sexual assault issues.

You have to tell your daughter that not every boy went to Urban. But the other part is you have to demand that the institutions you send your kids to do more to keep them safe. You’re paying tuition. These are basic rights. Our daughters deserve to be safe. They’re inhibiting the girls… girls are dropping out of school because they don’t feel safe. They are traumatized. Not just in aftermath of assault. It’s down the road. It’s years later…

You have to have real conversations with your kids

Part of the reason we got so involved in Audry and Daisy is because I sit in living rooms all the time. You have to have the conversation. It feels awkward and weird but he benefit far outweighs the awkwardness.

Question from Maryam: Sarah, you were going to talk about evidence based approaches.

Sarah: We talked about the US. 8 years ago I was in Niger with a group for women who were pooling their funds. They were using the time to talk about consent for sex and partners hitting you.

Overwhelmingly, the group said yes their partners hit them. They talked about it with pride. An expression of love was hitting and teaching women what’s needed.

We think about consent in the international context, the interventions that are most effective take into account the local context. A qualitative note to see what consent means and can mean in local context.

There’s a lot of evidence coming out developed countries. The CDC, EU, Australia.

In terms of the international space, there’s evidence that suggests that interventions that find opportunities to bring men and women together are effective. In some areas, men and women spend a lot of time apart and when you pull them together, it tends to have a bigger impact on views and sometimes has a bigger impact on behavior.

Healthcare settings in international settings have been most effective. There was a movement in the last decade to have a one-stop, gender-based violence center. That is not as effective. If you have healthcare providers in a basic healthcare setting who are trained to have them address these issues have been more effective and cost effective.

Some evidence that shows that training teachers and students in that context is effective. In Bangladesh the government fund nutrition fairs and women come to these, and integrating awareness into that. There’s some evidence that shows it can impact awareness and views. There isn’t yet a lower incidence of violence, but women know of their rights and they know they have an option not to have this happen.

There’s some evidence that men speaking to younger men have an impact. In self reported data, that’s shown to have the highest return. We have to follow these men into later life.

There are three levels of prevention:

– Primary – insuring a women never experiences violence

– Secondary – to insure that for a woman who has experienced, you stop it

– Tertiary – to be sure that once a woman is out of a violent situation, she can take care of herself and not enter into another abusive relationship. We need a more holistic package, and to ensure that tertiary recovery is most effective. (Maryam comment: Address the holistic needs for the survivor is similar to what we heard from Apne Aap.)

At a government site, where women in developing countries get their healthcare, and insuring that the programs are integrated – and using gender-based violence as a reason for doing that.

In developing countries, there’s so much work that needs to be done in terms of evidence. The WHO didn’t even start collecting data on gender based violence until 2013.

Now, what doesn’t work:

In the international space, there’s less evidence about bystander interventions that work. We’re lucky to have an intervention that is proven to impact bystander behavior.

In India, young women taking a bus and being raped. Other people on that bus intervening. In the international context there’s not a body of evidence that that works.

The evidence shows that programs that are focused on perpetrators don’t work. Threats, incarceration… most rapists are serial rapists. The evidence isn’t there that most of the programs can change that behavior.

Part of our advocacy is to intervene early and address childhood trauma early on. That is a paradigm shift that needs to happen

In universal screening for gender-based violence, asking everyone a question at a health site is not effective.

What is effective is training healthcare providers to recognize cues and ask questions in the appropriate way.

We know it’s effective to have a healthcare provider in the front line and we are finding out how they can be effective.

Rachael: In the US, we have evidence that bystander interventions can work. That came out last year, but internationally it hasn’t been proven.

CDC sites as a best practice – coaching boys into men program – the green dot initiative, especially on college campuses. U of Kentucky, in terms of engaging an entire community and creating a more positive school climate and there’s evidence it can extend out to communities at large.

Interventions with perpetrators: In the US, the data is mixed. We’ve done a lot of work with men who are violent. The batterer intervention program is different in each community. It works in some places and not in others. Is it a court-mandated program, which forces them to do it or they won’t see their kids? Or are they doing it voluntarily? In any event, a lot of these programs are being decimated because funding cuts.

We know that early interventions work. Men talking to boys works. Men talking to me won’t work because men are less willing to talk to each other.

Here in the US, we take our cues and notes from the CDC and the Dept of Health and Human Services, which has commissioned a lot of studies

For women and children who are living in homes with violence they may not call the police and they may not be able to get counseling, but they will disclose to a physician. Getting this to be a reimbursable expense from insurance companies. And targeting med schools to integrate it so it becomes second nature to future physicians.

But healthcare reform may undo that progress.

We have to use the evidence and we have to champion the evidence.

Universal screening works here but we’ve trained professionals in very specific ways. We train radiologists differently than a OB/Gyns, for example.

Sarah: Emerging areas with great promise:

Prevention: If you look at global funding it overwhelmingly goes to direct service to a woman who has experienced violence. In US too, to shelters, legal services, etc

But not as much to prevention.

It’s so heartening that we have evidence now that prevention works. Now funding to make that happen is so critical.

The critical time of adolescence. Data shows that most women first experience violence in adolescence. So understanding interventions that work in that time of life are underfunded.

Rachael: The area of violence against women is underfunded. Domestic violence funded has been so focused on crisis and intervention and direct service, that it’s never built the capacity for a movement. Everyone is in fighting, saving mode. We never have enough beds, never have people answering phones. If this is going to be a movement, we have to invest in the organizations themselves.

Ford Foundation and another organizations that used to fund this area have stopped because they said the US is not giving money. The current president recommended 29% cut in international funding and cuts across the board that will affect us.

I have never seen the progress we’ve made be so under threat internationally and domestically. I feel that what you are doing is what is going to change the world.  It’s an honor to be with you all this evening.

How do we get Americans to prioritize and act upon their value that is against violence against women?